Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  AbleCommerce  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  AbleCommerce  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  AbleCommerce  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  AbleCommerce  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 22 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  AbleCommerce  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    UPDATE 2: In case someone is interested, we have a developer Wiki article which has some instructions and sample code to integrate Gold with Google search.
    http://wiki.ablecommerce.com/index.php/Integrating_Google_Search_API_to_AC_Gold
    -—————————————————
    UPDATE 1: We are still looking into this request. Unfortunately, it didn’t make it into the last version. It will require significant changes to the search queries which are already very complex.

    It is still under consideration though. Hopefully, it will be possible. If we had more votes, that might influence the decision to add it.
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  AbleCommerce  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  AbleCommerce  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 36 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  AbleCommerce  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This feature has many votes, however, we will not be able to consider it unless we receive some comments or suggestions about why this couldn’t be accomplished using warehouses. When we are asked to change the logic of a major feature, we are very hesitant to do so as it can cause huge problems for the original design and function as it was intended to be used.

    Please submit your comments by Feb. 1st or the request will be closed.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Warehouses with Shipping methods works up to a point. The problem is that multiple shipments are created when they are not needed. For example, Product A ships from virtual Warehouse1 that uses both UPS and USPS shipping methods. Product B ships from virtual Warehouse 2 that only uses UPS shipping methods. The physical warehouse is the same for both items, but we must we set up two warehouses in AbleCommerce to deal with different shipping options. No matter which shipping method the customer selects selects for Product A shipping from Warehouse 1, even though in reality the cheapest route is usually to combine both shipments into the shipping method shared by both warehouses, in this case UPS. Ablecommerce has no way of knowing that Warehouse 1 and Warehouse 2 are the same physical warehouse, and therefore shipments could be combined if both Warehouses share a particular shipping method.

  9. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  AbleCommerce  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  AbleCommerce  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  11. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  AbleCommerce  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  AbleCommerce  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  AbleCommerce  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base